Skip to content

Avalanche Forecasts, Zone by Zone

Find the avalanche forecast for where you are going. Enter a ZIP to get the centre that covers it, see today's danger rating for every US forecast zone, and read what the five levels mean.

Loading today's ratings.
Forecast zones
83
Centres publishing
29
States with zones
13
Deaths on record since 1950-51
1,255
Start here

Find the forecast for where you are going

Avalanche forecasts are issued by zone, and the zone that matters is the one you will be travelling in rather than the one you live in. Enter a ZIP and this finds the nearest forecast zones and the centre that covers them.

Finds the nearest of the 83 US forecast zones and shows what each one’s centre has published right now. Each rating applies to the named zone, an area typically tens of miles across, never to the ZIP itself or to a specific slope.

The scale

What the five danger levels mean

Every avalanche centre in the United States and Canada uses the same five level scale, so a rating from Utah means what a rating from Mount Washington means. Each forecast explains what its level means for the terrain it covers, which is the part worth reading before you go.

  1. 1Low#50B848
  2. 2Moderate#FFF200
  3. 3Considerable#F7941E
  4. 4High#ED1C24
  5. 5Extreme#231F20
  6. –No ratingnot a level

Those are the five levels of the North American Public Avalanche Danger Scale, with the official colours from the National Avalanche Center’s own colour table. The scale was published in 2010 and updated in 2022, and is maintained by a working group of United States and Canadian organisations rather than by a single agency. What each level means, and what the scale says about travelling in it, is published beside the forecast that applies it, on the issuing centre’s page. The grey chip marks a zone whose centre has published no rating; it is not a sixth level.

A slab avalanche release on an open snow slope, with several stepped fracture lines cutting across the face and the smooth bed surface exposed below each one
A slab release above Les Confins in the Haute-Savoie, France, with the crown fractures stepping down the face. The depth of those walls and the layer they broke on are what a forecaster is trying to describe, and it is why the discussion under a danger rating matters more than the rating. “Avalanche Roualle @ Les Confins” by Rémih, CC BY-SA 4.0
Today

Danger ratings by zone

Ratings here come from the avalanche centre that forecasts each zone. A danger rating covers a whole forecast area, not the slope in front of you, and no rating is ever a statement that a place is safe. Read the centre’s full forecast before you go.
Reading api.avalanche.org for the United States…

Avalanche deaths in the United States

CAIC accident archive, 1950-51 to 2024-25
1,255
deaths since 1950-51
across 1,016 recorded accidents
23.7
a season, last ten seasons
237 deaths, 2015-16 to 2024-25
74%
fall in Feb, Jan, Mar
Feb alone took 74
87
were backcountry tourers
the archive’s own activity label, last ten seasons

Those are the Colorado Avalanche Information Center’s numbers from the national accident archive. A death count records what happened, and says nothing about how dangerous a state is today. Please cite the CAIC 2024 for all use.

Advertisement
The record

When and where avalanche deaths happen

The Forest Service puts the national figure plainly, and the Colorado Avalanche Information Center keeps the archive behind it.

“Each winter, 25-30 people are killed by avalanches in the United States.”

USDA Forest Service, Avalanche Safety overview

Authorship checked: The document is headed "USDA FOREST SERVICE AVALANCHE SAFETY" and describes the agency’s own avalanche mitigation and information programmes, citing Forest Service Manual 2357. It is distributed through avalanche.org, the site the Forest Service National Avalanche Center runs with the American Avalanche Association, rather than through fs.usda.gov. A Forest Service work published on a partner site is still a US Government work.

“The CAIC is the central archive for avalanche accidents in the United States and maintains detailed records going back to 1950, and sparse records back to the 1860s.”

Colorado Avalanche Information Center

Authorship checked: Published on avalanche.state.co.us, a Colorado state domain, on the CAIC’s own accident statistics page. The CAIC describes itself as "a program within the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Executive Director’s Office", and the accident workbook the page links names its maintainer as a CAIC staff member at a state.co.us address. The agency wrote it.

By month, last ten seasons

  1. Oct1
  2. Nov3
  3. Dec29
  4. Jan56
  5. Feb74
  6. Mar46
  7. Apr16
  8. May9
  9. Jun2
  10. Jul1
  11. Aug0
  12. Sep0

237 avalanche deaths in the United States across the 10 seasons 2015-16 to 2024-25, by month, from the Colorado Avalanche Information Center accident archive. Please cite the CAIC 2024 for all use. These are deaths in the national accident archive, not avalanches and not a danger rating. A month or a state with a low count is not a safe one: most of the difference between them is how many people are out in avalanche terrain.

The shape of that chart is the useful part. Feb is the worst month with 74 deaths in ten seasons, and Feb, Jan, Mar together take 74 percent of the total. But the tail runs from October to July, and the long tail is where people are most often caught out: spring corn skiing, summer snow climbing, and early-season storms falling on a thin, weak base.

By season

  1. 302015-16
  2. 122016-17
  3. 252017-18
  4. 252018-19
  5. 232019-20
  6. 372020-21
  7. 172021-22
  8. 302022-23
  9. 162023-24
  10. 222024-25

US avalanche deaths by season, 2015-16 to 2024-25. The ten-season total is 237, an average of 23.7 a season, against the 1,255 in the archive since 1950-51. A quiet season is not a safe season; it is one season.

By what people were doing

  1. Backcountry Tourer87
  2. Snowmobiler73
  3. Sidecountry Rider19
  4. Climber13
  5. Resident10
  6. Inbounds Rider8
  7. Hiker7
  8. Mechanized Guided Client6

Deaths by the archive’s own primary activity label, 2015-16 to 2024-25. The categories are the CAIC’s.

The Forest Service has the sharpest one-line framing of what that list means:

“Avalanches are the only natural hazard humans can cause while moving through the landscape.”

USDA Forest Service, Avalanche Safety overview

Authorship checked: Same Forest Service document as above, headed "USDA FOREST SERVICE AVALANCHE SAFETY" and citing FSM 2357 for the agency’s Avalanche Information and Education Program. Distributed on avalanche.org, which the Forest Service National Avalanche Center runs with the American Avalanche Association.

A person kneeling in a snow pit dug down through the snowpack, cutting an isolated column out of the pit wall with a snow saw, a shovel planted in the snow beside them
The work behind a danger rating: a pit dug down through the snowpack and a column cut out of its wall so it can be loaded until it fails. That test, on that slope, on that day, is what a forecast centre does and what a website cannot. “Avalanche testing snow pit” by Clayoquot, CC BY-SA 3.0

By state

Avalanche deaths on record by state since 1950-51, from the Colorado Avalanche Information Center’s national accident archive. Please cite the CAIC 2024 for all use. This is a count of deaths, not a ranking of danger: Colorado leads it partly because Colorado has an enormous amount of accessible avalanche terrain and an enormous number of people in it.
StateSince 1950-51Last 10 seasonsMost recentForecast zones
CO328582024-25yes
AK177322024-25yes
WA139232024-25yes
UT138242024-25yes
MT130222023-24yes
WY101242024-25yes
ID96252024-25yes
CA74122024-25yes
OR2592024-25yes
NH1722020-21yes
NV1542024-25none filed
NM622018-19yes
NY401999-00yes
ME201983-84none filed
AZ101994-95yes
ND102007-08none filed
VT102004-05none filed
Who forecasts

Who forecasts avalanches in the United States

There is no single national avalanche service. There are 31 organisations in the national registry, 13 of them USDA Forest Service programmes, 2 state agency programmes, and 16 nonprofits or observation exchanges. The Forest Service is the lead federal agency and says why:

“Because nearly all avalanche accidents involve recreation on National Forests and avalanches typically kill more people on National Forests than any other natural hazard, the Forest Service is the primary federal agency in this field.”

USDA Forest Service, Avalanche Safety overview

Authorship checked: Same Forest Service document, which opens "The Forest Service (FS) aims to reduce avalanche risk on National Forest Lands" and describes the agency’s own programme structure. Published on avalanche.org rather than fs.usda.gov; the author is the agency.

Even the federal centres are not federally funded in the way that phrase suggests. The Forest Service is direct about it, and it is the reason almost every Forest Service avalanche centre has a “Friends of” nonprofit beside it raising money:

“FS avalanche forecasts and education are used by millions of people each winter and have directly reduced the US avalanche fatality rate. More than half of the total funding comes from non-federal sources.”

USDA Forest Service, Avalanche Safety overview

Authorship checked: Same Forest Service document, in the section describing the Avalanche Information and Education Program under FSM 2357. It is the agency’s own account of how its avalanche centres are paid for, which is why the "Friends of" nonprofits exist alongside them.

An artillery piece on a gravel berm aimed across a wide snow-covered mountainside, with a small dark hut and equipment boxes beside it
Forecasting is only half of what agencies do about avalanches. The other half is mitigation: artillery emplacements like this one above Sylvan Pass in the Absaroka Range, Wyoming, are used to bring slopes down deliberately, at a chosen moment, above highways and ski areas. None of that work happens in the backcountry, and none of it is described by a forecast. “Sylvan1100450” by Gunnar Ries, CC BY-SA 4.0

Two of the 31 are not forecast programmes at all. The Eastern Wyoming Avalanche Info Exchange and the Southern Oregon Avalanche Info Exchange are observation exchanges: places where backcountry users share what they saw. They appear on the national map with polygons, which makes them look like forecast zones, and they issue no danger rating. They are marked as exchanges wherever they appear on this site.

Every zone row and centre link on this site goes to the centre’s own forecast, because the bottom line, the hazard discussion and the travel advice belong with the forecaster who wrote them.

Every organisation in the api.avalanche.org registry on 2026-09-03, with the register it falls into for this site’s licensing purposes. Two of them are observation exchanges rather than forecast programmes and are marked as such; they publish no danger rating.
CentreRegisterZones publishedHome state
Alaska Avalanche Information CenterNonprofit centre0AK
Bridgeport Avalanche CenterForest Service centre1CA
Bridger-Teton Avalanche CenterForest Service centre4WY
Central Oregon Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre2OR
Chugach National Forest Avalanche CenterForest Service centre4AK
Coastal Alaska Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre2AK
Colorado Avalanche Information CenterState agency1CO
Cordova Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre1AK
Crested Butte Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre0CO
Eastern Alaska Range Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre2AK
Eastern Sierra Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre1CA
Eastern Wyoming Avalanche Info Exchangeobservation exchange, no rating issuedNonprofit centre3WY
Flathead Avalanche CenterForest Service centre3MT
Gallatin NF Avalanche CenterForest Service centre8MT
Haines Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre3AK
Hatcher Pass Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre1AK
Idaho Panhandle Avalanche CenterForest Service centre5ID
Kachina Peaks Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre1AZ
Mount Shasta Avalanche CenterForest Service centre1CA
Mount Washington Avalanche CenterForest Service centre1NH
New York State Avalanche CenterState agency1NY
Northwest Avalanche CenterForest Service centre10WA
Payette Avalanche CenterForest Service centre2ID
Sawtooth Avalanche CenterForest Service centre4ID
Sierra Avalanche CenterForest Service centre1CA
Southern Oregon Avalanche Info Exchangeobservation exchange, no rating issuedNonprofit centre1OR
Taos Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre1NM
Utah Avalanche CenterForest Service centre9UT
Valdez Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre3AK
Wallowa Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre4OR
West Central Montana Avalanche CenterNonprofit centre3MT

Each organisation’s forecast is published on its own site, linked above. Register assignments follow the registry’s own classification of each centre; two untyped centres and two exchanges were classified from their own published descriptions.

“The Bridgeport Avalanche Center is one of 14 Forest Service avalanche centers.”

USDA Forest Service, Forecasting avalanches

Centre details on this page were checked one by one on 2026-09-03.

Coverage

The 37 states with no forecast zone

13 states had at least one forecast zone filed under them on 2026-09-03; the other 37 did not. Zones are filed by the centre that publishes them, so that is a statement about where zones are filed rather than where avalanches happen, and each state below carries its own reason from the record.

Partly inside a forecast area, with no zone of its own

  • NevadaNevada has no forecast zone filed under it, though part of the state sits inside a forecast area. The Sierra Avalanche Center’s only polygon is filed under California, but the centre’s registry entry lists National Weather Service public zones on both sides of the state line, NVZ002 Greater Lake Tahoe and CAZ072 Greater Lake Tahoe (CA), and the polygon’s eastern edge sits east of the 120 degree line in the Carson Range. Terrain on the Nevada side of Tahoe is inside that forecast; terrain in the Ruby Mountains, the Santa Rosas and the rest of the Great Basin is not inside any. The Sierra Avalanche Center is the centre to read for the Tahoe side, and the CAIC archive records 15 avalanche deaths in Nevada since 1950, 2024-25 being the most recent.

Avalanche deaths on record, no forecast centre

  • MaineNo avalanche centre forecasts Maine, yet the CAIC archive records 2 avalanche deaths in the state since 1950, the most recent in 1983-84. Unforecast is not the same as safe: it means nobody is publishing a rating for the terrain.
  • North DakotaNo avalanche centre forecasts North Dakota, yet the CAIC archive records 1 avalanche death in the state since 1950, the most recent in 2007-08. Unforecast is not the same as safe: it means nobody is publishing a rating for the terrain.
  • VermontNo avalanche centre forecasts Vermont, yet the CAIC archive records 1 avalanche death in the state since 1950, the most recent in 2004-05. Unforecast is not the same as safe: it means nobody is publishing a rating for the terrain.

No forecast zone and no death in the archive

Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin.

No avalanche centre files a forecast zone under any of those 33 states, and the Colorado Avalanche Information Center’s national accident archive records no avalanche death in any of them since 1950. That is a statement about the record and not a guarantee: the archive counts deaths, not avalanches, and small slides on steep snow are possible anywhere snow sits on a slope of about thirty degrees or more.

Common questions

Avalanche forecast FAQ

Avalanche forecasts by state

Related conditions

The five-level scale this whole system runs on was published in 2010 and updated in 2022, and is maintained by a working group of United States and Canadian organisations rather than by any single agency. Its repository publishes the definition tables, the icons and the official colour specification, and that colour table is where the five colours on this site come from.

Summarised from the National Avalanche Center’s NAPADS repository, linked for the original text.

Advertisement

Live danger ratings on this page come from api.avalanche.org, run by the USDA Forest Service National Avalanche Center with the American Avalanche Association, and are the issuing centres’ own words passed through untouched. Live avalanche watches, warnings and advisories on the state pages come from api.weather.gov, a US Government work in the public domain. Accident figures come from the Colorado Avalanche Information Center.
Structural snapshot of the forecasting system (which centres exist, which zones each publishes, roughly where they are) read from api.avalanche.org on 2026-09-03: 31 centres, 83 zones, 13 states. It holds structure only; ratings are read live at page load. Accident figures are the Colorado Avalanche Information Center’s, read 2026-09-03. Please cite the CAIC 2024 for all use. Dates shown as Sep 3, 2026.
Every rating on this site is the issuing centre’s own and forecast text is read on the centre’s page. Read the centre’s full forecast before you go.
Hero image: “Silent Bob Avalanche” — 420 Photography — CC0

Back to the top of the avalanche hub.