
Private Well Water, County by County
Enter a ZIP code and get a report: the principal aquifers USGS maps under that county, how many self-supplied people USGS counted on each, the county's domestic groundwater use, and where your state's well program and testing guidance live. Built from USGS's 2015 county level releases covering 42 million people.
about 42 million Americans drink from a well nobody is required to test, 13.2 percent of the countryWhat is under your well?
USGS county estimates, 2015The report covers every county your ZIP touches, because about 29 percent of ZIP codes cross a county line and the aquifer under you can change with it. It describes a regional map, and two wells on the same road can differ.
The Safe Drinking Water Act stops at your property line
If your water arrives in a pipe from a utility, a federal law sets what must be tested and how often, a state agency reviews the results, violations go into a public federal database and a report lands in your mailbox every year. If your water comes from a well in your yard, none of that exists. EPA states it directly:
US EPA, Private Drinking Water Wells“The quality and safety of drinking water from private domestic wells are not regulated by the Federal Government under the Safe Drinking Water Act nor by most state governments and laws.”
US EPA, Private Drinking Water Wells“Around 15 percent of the U.S. population (over 43 million) rely on private wells as their source of drinking water.”
Two systems, one country
Community water system
- Federal sampling schedule
- Violations reported to EPA, public
- Annual Consumer Confidence Report by law
- A primacy agency reviewing results
- Roughly nine in ten Americans
Private well
- No required test, ever
- No public record of anything
- No report, no notification
- Nobody reviewing anything
- About 42 million people
Both halves are on this site. Drinking water quality covers the systems EPA does track, their federal violation record and where their annual reports live. No agency collects comparable data for private wells, and these pages cover that half.
USGS, Domestic (Private) Supply Wells“The quality and safety of water from privately owned domestic wells is not regulated under Federal or, in most cases, state laws. Homeowners are primarily responsible for maintaining their domestic well systems and for any water-quality monitoring.”

The aquifers most private wells draw from
USGS maps the country into principal aquifers and, for its 2015 compilation, attributed each county's groundwater use to the ones it draws from: 10,520 county and aquifer rows across 67 codes. Here is USGS's definition of the unit, because it does a lot of work on these pages:
USGS, Principal Aquifers of the United States“An aquifer is a geologic formation, a group of formations, or a part of a formation that contains sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs.”
USGS, Principal Aquifers of the United States“A principal aquifer is defined as a regionally extensive aquifer or aquifer system that has the potential to be used as a source of potable (drinkable) water. For study or mapping purposes, aquifers are often combined into aquifer systems.”
Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions)
self-supplied residents USGS attributed to it in 2015, across 805 counties in 22 jurisdictions. USGS ranks it 1 of 67 by that measure.
USGS 2015Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers
self-supplied residents USGS attributed to it in 2015, across 260 counties in 11 jurisdictions. USGS ranks it 2 of 67 by that measure.
USGS 2015New York and New England crystalline-rock aquifers
self-supplied residents USGS attributed to it in 2015, across 79 counties in 7 jurisdictions. USGS ranks it 3 of 67 by that measure.
USGS 2015Floridan aquifer system
self-supplied residents USGS attributed to it in 2015, across 141 counties in 4 jurisdictions. USGS ranks it 4 of 67 by that measure.
USGS 2015Other aquifers
self-supplied residents USGS attributed to it in 2015, across 834 counties in 37 jurisdictions. USGS ranks it 5 of 67 by that measure.
USGS 2015Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system
self-supplied residents USGS attributed to it in 2015, across 115 counties in 9 jurisdictions. USGS ranks it 6 of 67 by that measure.
USGS 2015One of those six is not a rock formation at all. USGS files groundwater it maps no principal aquifer for under a residual code it calls Other aquifers, and that bucket carries people in 834 counties. In much of the country the productive water for a household comes from something too local or too discontinuous to appear on a national map, and these pages show that category as USGS files it.
Our summary of information published by USGS Principal Aquifers of the United States

And the limit that governs every aquifer number on this site: USGS is describing a map of where people are, not a survey of wells.
USGS, Domestic (Private) Supply Wells“USGS maps show where people across the Nation rely on private wells for their drinking water. The maps estimate the number of people using private wells in a given area, but individual wells are not identified.”
Where private wells are normal, and where they are lonely
9 states have a quarter or more of their population on self-supplied water: Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Indiana, Wisconsin, Montana, Alaska. Another 15 sit under 10 percent, where a well owner is genuinely unusual among their neighbours. The rest are in between, and so is the country as a whole at 13.2 percent. By raw numbers the order is different: Pennsylvania, Michigan, New York, Florida, North Carolina carry the largest well populations, and only two of those five clear the 25 percent line.
| State | People on private wells | Share of state | Page shape | Counties | Leading aquifer USGS lists |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | 660,497 | 49.7% | A well state | 16 | New York and New England crystalline-rock aquifers |
| New Hampshire | 497,180 | 37.4% | A well state | 10 | New York and New England crystalline-rock aquifers |
| Vermont | 243,796 | 38.9% | A well state | 14 | New York and New England crystalline-rock aquifers |
| Massachusetts | 615,948 | 9.1% | Mostly served | 14 | New York and New England crystalline-rock aquifers |
| Rhode Island | 112,853 | 10.7% | Mixed | 5 | New York and New England crystalline-rock aquifers |
| Connecticut | 861,472 | 24% | Mixed | 8 | New York and New England crystalline-rock aquifers |
| New York | 2,499,435 | 12.6% | Mixed | 62 | Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) |
| New Jersey | 966,024 | 10.8% | Mixed | 21 | Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system |
| Pennsylvania | 3,470,761 | 27.1% | A well state | 67 | Valley and Ridge aquifers |
| Delaware | 181,640 | 19.2% | Mixed | 3 | Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system |
| Maryland | 1,423,948 | 23.7% | Mixed | 24 | Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system |
| Virginia | 1,558,115 | 18.6% | Mixed | 133 | Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers |
| West Virginia | 391,591 | 21.2% | Mixed | 55 | Pennsylvanian aquifers |
| North Carolina | 2,407,661 | 24% | Mixed | 100 | Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers |
| South Carolina | 1,182,721 | 24.2% | Mixed | 46 | Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers |
| Georgia | 1,514,397 | 14.8% | Mixed | 159 | Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers |
| Florida | 2,460,295 | 12.1% | Mixed | 67 | Floridan aquifer system |
| Alabama | 539,394 | 11.1% | Mixed | 67 | Southeastern Coastal Plain aquifer system |
| Mississippi | 434,766 | 14.5% | Mixed | 82 | Coastal lowlands aquifer system |
| Tennessee | 594,482 | 9% | Mostly served | 95 | Valley and Ridge aquifers |
| Kentucky | 440,663 | 10% | Mixed | 120 | Pennsylvanian aquifers |
| Arkansas | 144,444 | 4.9% | Mostly served | 75 | Other aquifers |
| Louisiana | 491,582 | 10.5% | Mixed | 64 | Coastal lowlands aquifer system |
| Ohio | 1,861,023 | 16% | Mixed | 88 | Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) |
| Michigan | 2,597,314 | 26.2% | A well state | 83 | Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) |
| Indiana | 1,677,339 | 25.3% | A well state | 92 | Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) |
| Illinois | 1,151,113 | 9% | Mostly served | 102 | Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) |
| Wisconsin | 1,598,065 | 27.7% | A well state | 72 | Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) |
| Minnesota | 1,176,917 | 21.4% | Mixed | 87 | Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) |
| Iowa | 494,022 | 15.8% | Mixed | 99 | Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) |
| Missouri | 821,343 | 13.5% | Mixed | 115 | Ozark Plateaus aquifer system |
| Kansas | 149,282 | 5.1% | Mostly served | 105 | Alluvial aquifers |
| Nebraska | 171,440 | 9% | Mostly served | 93 | High Plains aquifer |
| North Dakota | 46,353 | 6.1% | Mostly served | 53 | Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) |
| South Dakota | 128,711 | 14.6% | Mixed | 66 | Lower Cretaceous aquifers |
| Montana | 304,630 | 29.5% | A well state | 56 | Northern Rocky Mountains Intermontane Basins aquifer systems |
| Wyoming | 119,066 | 20.3% | Mixed | 23 | Alluvial aquifers |
| Colorado | 286,474 | 5.3% | Mostly served | 64 | Denver Basin aquifer system |
| Utah | 61,378 | 2% | Mostly served | 29 | Colorado Plateaus aquifers |
| Idaho | 396,215 | 23.9% | Mixed | 44 | Snake River Plain basaltic-rock aquifers |
| Nevada | 192,557 | 6.7% | Mostly served | 17 | Basin and Range basin-fill aquifers |
| Arizona | 218,170 | 3.2% | Mostly served | 15 | Basin and Range basin-fill aquifers |
| New Mexico | 292,165 | 14% | Mixed | 33 | Rio Grande aquifer system |
| Oklahoma | 356,860 | 9.1% | Mostly served | 77 | Alluvial aquifers |
| Texas | 1,315,073 | 4.8% | Mostly served | 254 | Edwards-Trinity aquifer system |
| California | 1,435,510 | 3.7% | Mostly served | 58 | Central Valley aquifer system |
| Oregon | 631,538 | 15.7% | Mixed | 36 | Willamette Lowland basin-fill aquifers |
| Washington | 1,023,853 | 14.3% | Mixed | 39 | Puget Sound aquifer system |
| Alaska | 188,794 | 25.6% | A well state | 29 | Alaska unconsolidated-deposit aquifers |
| Hawaii | 56,296 | 3.9% | Mostly served | 5 | Hawaii volcanic-rock aquifers |
What to test for, and how often
There is no schedule anyone will send you, so here is EPA's, in EPA's words:
US EPA, Protect Your Home’s Water“Test your private well annually for total coliform bacteria, nitrates, total dissolved solids, and pH levels. If you suspect the presence of other contaminants, you should test for those also. You can also contact your local health department to find out what substances may be common in your area’s groundwater.”
US EPA, Protect Your Home’s Water“You may want to test more frequently if small children or elderly adults live in your house or if someone in your house is pregnant or nursing. These segments of the population are often more vulnerable to pollutants than others.”
Beyond that baseline the list is local, which is why every state page here links the state program that publishes local guidance and, where the state runs a separate testing office, that too. County and district health departments are usually the best local answer and often run or subsidise the test itself. Laboratory, test kit and treatment choices follow from a test result and a licensed installer, which is why the state program and the county health department are the right next step.
What USGS found when it did sample domestic wells nationally is worth knowing, and worth reading as what it is: a description of a national sample, not a forecast for any tap.
USGS Circular 1332, Quality of water from domestic wells in principal aquifers of the United States, 1991–2004“This study from the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) assesses water-quality conditions for about 2,100 domestic wells. The sampled wells are located in 48 states and in parts of 30 regionally extensive aquifers used for water supply in the United States.”
US EPA, Private Drinking Water Wells“A U.S. Geologic Survey study of 2,100 private wells found that water pumped from about one in five wells contained one or more contaminants at a concentration greater than a human-health benchmark for drinking water.”
USGS, Domestic (Private) Supply Wells“The contaminants most often found at these elevated concentrations were inorganic chemicals, such as metals , radionuclides , and nitrate ; all of these but nitrate are derived primarily from natural sources.”
About one in five is a rate across two thousand sampled wells spread over 48 states, and it is not a probability that applies to a particular well. A well with a sound casing, a good cap and nothing upslope is a different proposition from one that is fifty years old beside a barn, and USGS sampled both. The reason the figure matters is that it is large enough to make testing the reasonable default, not that it predicts anything about a specific household.
Our summary of information published by USGS Circular 1332, quality of water from domestic wells in principal aquifers
USGS Circular 1332, Quality of water from domestic wells in principal aquifers of the United States, 1991–2004“The lack of regular monitoring of domestic wells makes periodic assessments at national, regional, and local scales important sources for providing information about this key source of drinking water.”

Private well water FAQ
Population, withdrawal and aquifer figures are USGS's, from its estimated use of water in the United States county level data for 2015 (published June 2018 (v2.0)) and its estimated groundwater withdrawals from principal aquifers county level data for 2015 (published February 2020 (v1.0)). ZIP to county resolution uses the Census Bureau's ZCTA relationship file. Testing guidance is quoted from EPA Protect Your Home’s Water. All are US Government works in the public domain. What a particular well holds is settled by a laboratory test on that well. Drinking water quality, for everyone on a system