Skip to content
Fifty states read on one day. 14 of them publish a ground snow load of their own.

Ground Snow Load by State

Whose document carries the number where you are, the 235 figures those documents print, what each one is keyed to, and the row every line was read from.

14
States publishing a figure of their own
28% of the fifty
19
That leave it to a building department
the commonest arrangement in the country
235
Published figures read
across 33 states
16
States with case study terrain
where the document declines to give one
The finding

In thirty six states there is no state ground snow load

A ground snow load is the weight of snow a building code assumes will sit on the ground at a given place, in pounds per square foot. It is the starting figure a structural engineer works from, and the question people arrive with is almost always the same one: what is it here. The answer depends far less on how much snow falls than on which of three arrangements the state happens to use.

14 states publish something of their own that a reader can look a place up in: a map, a table, or a study the building code names. 17 adopt the national code and write no snow amendment, so the governing figure sits in a standard rather than on any state page. The remaining 19 set nothing at state level at all, and every figure in those states belongs to a county or a city building department.

That last group is why one state produces three different answers on three different websites, all of them correct for the place they were written for. The band below is the split, and the table under it names which states sit where.

  • 14 of 50The state publishes its own
  • 17 of 50The adopted code carries it
  • 19 of 50The building department decides
Fifty states, read September 23, 2026.
Where the figure comes fromStatesShareWhich
Each building departmentEvery figure comes from a county or a city1938%Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wyoming
The adopted codeNo state snow amendment, so the code governs1734%Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Nebraska, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas
The state publishes a tableA state table, usually county by county918%Connecticut, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Utah
The state drew a mapA state map with towns or bands on it36%North Carolina, Vermont, Wisconsin
A study the state adoptedA commissioned study the building code names24%Montana, New Hampshire
The front of a wide stone and brick county court house during a snow shower, the words PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY COURT HOUSE carved across the facade above the glass entrance doors, and a bronze group of running horses on a plinth in the foreground under fresh snow
Fourteen states publish a map, a table or a study of their own that a reader can look a place up in. Seventeen adopt the national code and write no snow amendment, so the governing figure is the standard’s rather than the state’s. The remaining nineteen set nothing at all, and there the number lives with a county or a city: the office that issues the permit is the office that holds it. “PG courthouse winter”, Sallicio, Public Domain
The fourteen with a document of their own

Where a reader can look it up in one step

Connecticut, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont and Wisconsin. They have less in common than the snowfall map would suggest. Some of the snowiest states in the country are not on this list, and some of the states on it publish a single figure that covers everywhere.

What these fourteen share is administrative rather than meteorological: at some point a code council decided that the national table was too coarse for the terrain it was being applied to, and commissioned or drew something keyed more finely. The document is linked on every one of those state pages, because the document is the thing worth having.

Ordered by how few steps stand between a reader and a figure keyed to their own town.
StateWho publishes the figureKeyed toFigures read
VermontThe state drew a mapBy region or zone14
North CarolinaThe state drew a mapBy elevation3
WisconsinThe state drew a mapBy region or zone
ConnecticutThe state publishes a tableCounty by county12
MassachusettsThe state publishes a tableCounty by county12
MichiganThe state publishes a tableCounty by county12
Rhode IslandThe state publishes a tableCounty by county12
UtahThe state publishes a tableBy elevation12
MarylandThe state publishes a tableCounty by county10
IndianaThe state publishes a tableCounty by county9
MinnesotaThe state publishes a tableCounty by county8
New JerseyThe state publishes a tableCounty by county6
MontanaA study the state adoptedBy elevation12
New HampshireA study the state adoptedBy elevation12
TexasThe adopted codeBy region or zone6
AlaskaThe adopted codeBy region or zone4
New YorkThe adopted codeBy elevation4
MaineThe adopted codeCounty by county3
OhioThe adopted codeCounty by county3
ArkansasThe adopted codeBy region or zone2
LouisianaThe adopted codeCounty by county1
AlabamaThe adopted codeOne figure statewide
FloridaThe adopted codeOne figure statewide
GeorgiaThe adopted codeCounty by county
IowaThe adopted codeNot stated
KentuckyThe adopted codeOne figure statewide
NebraskaThe adopted codeNot stated
North DakotaThe adopted codeNot stated
OregonThe adopted codeBy elevation
South CarolinaThe adopted codeCounty by county
TennesseeThe adopted codeCounty by county
CaliforniaEach building departmentBy elevation12
WashingtonEach building departmentBy elevation12
ArizonaEach building departmentBy elevation11
NevadaEach building departmentBy elevation9
DelawareEach building departmentCounty by county7
IdahoEach building departmentBy elevation6
OklahomaEach building departmentBy region or zone6
VirginiaEach building departmentCounty by county4
WyomingEach building departmentBy region or zone4
PennsylvaniaEach building departmentCounty by county3
ColoradoEach building departmentBy elevation2
KansasEach building departmentCounty by county1
South DakotaEach building departmentCounty by county1
HawaiiEach building departmentNot stated
IllinoisEach building departmentNot stated
MississippiEach building departmentCounty by county
MissouriEach building departmentNot stated
New MexicoEach building departmentBy elevation
West VirginiaEach building departmentCounty by county
Advertisement
Why one state figure is usually the wrong question

The distance inside a single state

Nevada publishes figures from 20 psf at Churchill County to 600 at Lake Tahoe Basin, Risk Category II. Both are Nevada figures, both are current, and both were printed by the same body. The difference between them is elevation, which is what 13 states key their figures to. A county line, which is what 21 states key theirs to, moves the answer far less.

This is the single most misleading thing about the way the subject is usually written up. A page offering one number per state has taken one row out of a table with several dozen rows in it, and in a mountain state the row it took can be an order of magnitude away from the row that applies to the reader. Every figure below carries the place it belongs to and the band or county its own document keyed it to.

A long single storey log building with a steep shingle roof standing among tall snow covered firs, deep snow lying along the roof and curling over the porch edge in a thick lip hung with icicles, drifts banked to the window sills, and a small carved sign reading COMMUNITY BUILDING above the doors
At the top of the range a place stops having one number. The Lake Tahoe Basin in Nevada publishes 600 pounds per square foot for one elevation band, and Mt. Baker Ski Area in Washington 588, both read off a local table rather than a state one. Where the loads get large the jurisdiction usually splits its map by height above sea level, so two addresses in the same county are given different figures. “Longmire Community Building in winter, 2015. (00ba31a8-5cb1-42c5-adfa-0c988527a0e3)”, NPS Photo, Public Domain
The 29 states with more than one published figure, widest apart first.
StateLowest printedHighest printedDistance between them
Nevada20 psfChurchill County600Lake Tahoe Basin, Risk Category II580
Washington15 (Revised Ground Snow Load, psf)Bellingham588 (Revised Ground Snow Load, psf)Mt. Baker Ski Area573
California29 psfNevada County542 psfNevada County513
Montana19.2 psfDillon AP410.7 psfNorth Fork Jocko391.5
Michigan20WAYNE100KEWEENAW: TOWNSHIP OF EAGLE HARBOR, TOWNSHIP OF GRANT, TOWNSHIP OF HOUGHTON80
Arizona0City of Bullhead City75Coconino County75
New Hampshire50 lb/ft2Portsmouth120 lb/ft2Beans Purchase70
Idaho15 psfTwin Falls70 lbs per sq ftHayden, North of Miles Avenue55
Utah21 lb/ft2St. George67 lb/ft2Monticello46
Alaska60 pounds per square footCity of Fairbanks100 lbs. per square footCordova40
Massachusetts25 psfProvincetown60 psfAdams35
New York25 psfNew York City60, 64, 66 or 68Town Of Ephratah, Fulton County, New York35
Vermont40 lbs.Williston70 lbs.Killington30
Maryland20 pounds per square footWorcester County40 psfCarroll County20
Every figure read, largest first

The 235 published figures

Each of these was printed by a public body in a document linked beside it, and each appears here in the unit and the wording that document used. The spellings differ because the documents differ: psf, P.S.F., lbs, lbs per sq ft, and in a few county tables a bare number whose unit is given in a footnote. Normalising them would be tidier and would put a figure on the page that nobody published.

Each one governs the place its own document named and no further: a county figure covers that county, an elevation band holds inside that band, and a place its document passed over stands with none until the document is amended.

A residential street after a heavy snowfall seen at eye level from the middle of the road, parked cars buried to their windows along both kerbs, two sets of tyre tracks running away between them, and bare trees white to the tips arching over the street
The published figures reach a long way south of the places snow is famous for. Bullhead City in Arizona and Jefferson Parish in Louisiana both print zero. Midland, Texas prints three and a half pounds per square foot. Every one of those was set by a city or a parish rather than by the state, which is why one state can return three different answers from three different pages. “Snowy Residential Street 1”, Amaury Laporte, CC BY 2.0
The forty largest of 235 figures. The rest are on the state pages.
Figure, as printedPlaceStateKeyed toDocument
600Lake Tahoe Basin, Risk Category II10000NevadaElevation bandSource
588 (Revised Ground Snow Load, psf)Mt. Baker Ski Area4200 (Approx. Average Elevation, feet)WashingtonTown or citySource
542 psfNevada County7501-8000 ft.CaliforniaElevation bandSource
510Washoe County, west of US 395, Risk Category II10000NevadaElevation bandSource
410.7 psfNorth Fork Jocko6330 ftMontanaZoneSource
400Town of Truckee7501-8000CaliforniaElevation bandSource
321.3 psfBadger Pass6900 ftMontanaZoneSource
315Lake Tahoe Basin, Risk Category II6000NevadaElevation bandSource
300 poundsTown of Mammoth Lakeselevations greater than 8,500 feetCaliforniaElevation bandSource
285 psfVirginia Lakes9,600 ft.CaliforniaZoneSource
260Town of Truckee5500CaliforniaElevation bandSource
203Washoe County, east of US 395, Risk Category II10000NevadaElevation bandSource
203Washoe County, west of US 395, Risk Category II6000NevadaElevation bandSource
155 psfJune Lake7,600 ft.CaliforniaZoneSource
140 lbs.Modoc CountyCaliforniaCountySource
135.0 psfWest Yellowstone6659 ftMontanaTown or citySource
129 (Revised Ground Snow Load, psf)Newhalem510 (Approx. Average Elevation, feet)WashingtonTown or citySource
120 lb/ft2Beans Purchase2000 ftNew HampshireTown or citySource
115 lb/ft2Jackson1800 ftNew HampshireTown or citySource
105.2 psfRed Lodge 2 N5500 ftMontanaTown or citySource
100 lbs. per square footCordovaAlaskaTown or citySource
100 pounds per square footMammoth Yosemite AirportCaliforniaZoneSource
100KEWEENAW: TOWNSHIP OF EAGLE HARBOR, TOWNSHIP OF GRANT, TOWNSHIP OF HOUGHTONMichiganTown or citySource
100 lb/ft2Berlin1600 ftNew HampshireTown or citySource
100 (Revised Ground Snow Load, psf)Diablo910 (Approx. Average Elevation, feet)WashingtonTown or citySource
95.7 psfBozeman 12 NE5950 ftMontanaTown or citySource
95 pounds per square footPetersburgAlaskaTown or citySource
90KEWEENAWMichiganCountySource
80 lb/sqftHermonMaineTown or citySource
80LewistonMaineTown or citySource
80HOUGHTONMichiganCountySource
80 lb/ft2Laconia900 ftNew HampshireTown or citySource
80 lb/ft2Lebanon1200 ftNew HampshireTown or citySource
77 (Revised Ground Snow Load, psf)Maple Falls643 (Approx. Average Elevation, feet)WashingtonTown or citySource
75Coconino County7500 to 8000ArizonaElevation bandSource
75Jacob Lake7920ArizonaZoneSource
75 lb/ft2Hanover1300 ftNew HampshireTown or citySource
74 (Revised Ground Snow Load, psf)Glacier900 (Approx. Average Elevation, feet)WashingtonTown or citySource
71 psfNevada County0-5000 ft.CaliforniaElevation bandSource
70 PSFSoldotnaAlaskaTown or citySource
Why a lookup comes back empty

Case study areas, in 16 states

In mountainous terrain the national mapping is too coarse to be keyed to a point, and the published documents say so themselves. Rather than print a figure they cannot stand behind, they mark the area as requiring a case study and send the designer to the local building department, which is the body with the authority to set one.

This is the commonest reason a reader searching for their own address finds nothing, and it is almost never explained at the point where the search fails. The rules are quoted below in the words the documents used.

  • Arizona

    Coconino County prints no figure above 8,000 feet and points to its own commissioned study for the rest, so a reader on the high ground has to go to the county building division rather than to a table.

    Ground Snow Load – Coconino County Ground Snow Loads are established through a Case Study (CS) and references the "Ground Snow Load Case Study for Coconino County". ... Coconino County Above 8000 Design according to accepted engineering practice

    The rule as published

  • California

    Some California counties and cities print no number at all and send the reader to the building official, to a county map or to a national hazard tool for the value at a particular address.

    The minimum ground snow load used to determine the design loads for buildings and other structures shall be specified by the El Dorado County Building Official. The Building Safety Division shall establish and enforce the snow load design criteria of El Dorado County.

    The rule as published

  • Idaho

    Kootenai County prints its ground snow load as Varies and sends the reader to a 1986 University of Idaho publication and its map, so a site specific figure has to come from the building department.

    1608.2: Ground Snow Loads. Delete entire section and replace with the following: The ground snow loads shall be determined using factors and methodology contained in the publication entitled Ground and Roof Snow Loads for Idaho and the accompanying map entitled Normalized Ground Snow Loads For Idaho by the University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 1986.

    The rule as published

  • Maine

    Large parts of Maine come back from the national tool as a case study area, and the State Fire Marshal's guidance prints the exact procedure a designer follows when that happens.

    If “Case Study Required” is displayed, click the return button in the upper right corner and follow the below instructions. 1) Select “ASCE/SEI 7-22” under Standard Version 2) Select the appropriate Risk Category 3) Check “Snow” for Load Type 4) Click “View Results” 5) The Snow Load given should be reduced by the following equation to bring it to ASCE/SEI 7-16 loads: SL22 * 0.70 = SL16 (Value not less than100 lb/ft2)

    The rule as published

  • Montana

    A site that is not near a listed station, or is at a different elevation from one, has no tabled value and the reader has to ask the State Building Codes Bureau or the local building official for it.

    For areas not listed, not of the same elevation as listed, or locations having some other variable, ground snow loads should be determined by calling the State Building Codes Bureau at (406) 841-2056.

    The rule as published

  • Nevada

    The table prints a value only every 500 feet of elevation and its own note leaves anything between two rows to the designer, so a site part way up has no row to read, and Douglas County publishes no figure of its own at all.

    Intermediate values may be determined by interpolation

    The rule as published

  • New Hampshire

    The study was written because the national map gives New Hampshire no usable statewide numbers, so a case study was run for every one of the 259 towns; above 2,500 feet the table stops and the document says a site specific case study is still required.

    Do not use this information above 2500 ft: Conduct a site-specific snow load case study.

    The rule as published

  • New Jersey

    New Jersey's rule is written around the case study answer: where the national hazard website returns case study rather than a number, the state's own bulletin names six northern counties and gives each one a figure, and says every other county will return a number.

    If the website returns with “case study (CS),” one may use withdrawn Bulletin 94-8 values for the following counties: Sussex, 50 psf; Warren, 35 psf; Hunterdon, 35psf; Passaic, 40 psf; Morris, 35 psf; Somerset, 30 psf. All other counties should generate a load number.

    The rule as published

The nineteen with nothing at state level

When the figure comes from a counter

In these states the building department with jurisdiction over the parcel holds the figure, and it holds it in whatever form suits it: a county code amendment, an elevation table on a handout, a line in an ordinance, or a value a plans examiner looks up against the address. The agency named beside each state below is the one that decides, and the rule linked beside it is what puts the decision there.

Several of these states carry more published figures than states with a statewide document do, because a county writing for its own terrain tends to key more finely than a state writing for everybody.

The states where no ground snow load is set at state level.
StateWho sets the figureKeyed toFigures read
CaliforniaThe city or county building department, with any change filed with the California Building Standards Commissioneach city and county sets its own figure by amending the state code on a local findingBy elevation12
Washingtonthe county or city building department (for example Whatcom County Planning and Development Services, Chelan County Community Development, King County Department of Local Services)the county looks the value up against the parcelBy elevation12
ArizonaThe county board of supervisors for unincorporated land, and the city or town for land inside itArizona has no statewide building code for private construction, so each county and municipality adopts and fills in its ownBy elevation11
Nevadathe city or county building departmentNevada law leaves adoption to each city and countyBy elevation9
Delawarethe county or municipal building department where the work isDelaware has no statewide building code, so the county or the town writes the number into its own adopted codeCounty by county7
Idahothe city or county building departmenteach jurisdiction sets and publishes its own figureBy elevation6
Oklahomathe city or county building department, as the authority having jurisdiction under the Oklahoma Uniform Building Code Commission's rulesthe statewide rule leaves the snow cell empty and names the local jurisdiction as the one who fills itBy region or zone6
Virginiathe building official of the county, city or town where the work isthe state code hands the climatic and geographic design criteria to the locality, and each building department publishes its own figureCounty by county4
Wyomingthe city or county building departmenteach jurisdiction adopts its own code and publishes its own figureBy region or zone4
Pennsylvaniathe building code official of the municipality where the work isthe number is written into the code's design criteria table locally, most often by municipal ordinanceCounty by county3
Coloradothe city, county or regional building departmentColorado adopts no building code statewide, so each jurisdiction adopts its own and publishes its own figureBy elevation2
Kansasthe county or the city, under its own home rule authoritya county's regulations reach only its unincorporated areas, and inside a city that city's own adopted code controlsCounty by county1
South Dakotathe county or city building departmentthe code a South Dakota project is built to is the one that county or city adopted, and its own handbook is where the snow figure is printedCounty by county1
Hawaiithe county building department: the City and County of Honolulu, the County of Hawaii, the County of Maui and the County of Kauaithe one county code that could be read prints the heading and leaves the figure outNot stated
Illinoisyour city, village, or county code officialthe state board that oversees construction codes publishes no snow load figures and says the code official where the work is has the answerNot stated
Mississippithe county board of supervisors or the municipal governing authority, and the Mississippi Building Codes Council for the codes they may choose fromeach county and municipality picks its edition, and some opted out of having a code at allCounty by county
Missourithe county commission, or the incorporated city, town or village, where the work isthe statute lets each community adopt a construction code by reference, and the state adopts none for site built housesNot stated
New Mexicothe city or county building departmentthe state amends neither code's snow provisions, so the figure comes from the local jurisdictionBy elevation
West Virginiathe local jurisdiction that adopted the State Building Code, and the West Virginia State Fire Commission for the rule itselfthe county or city building department that adopted the code fills in the blanks the code leaves to the jurisdictionCounty by county
What the state adopted, and whether it changed it

The codes behind the figures

Every figure on these pages sits inside an adopted building code, and 22 states amended the code they adopted rather than taking it as written. An amendment is where a state snow load table usually lives, so the amended column is a reasonable first place to look when a state appears to have no document of its own.

Editions matter here more than they look as though they should. Codes are adopted on a cycle of a few years, a county can amend one in between, and the national standard changed how it presents ground snow load between recent editions. The adopting rule linked beside each state is what governs on the day.

Amended codes first. The rest are on the state pages.
StateCode adoptedEditionAmended by the stateAdopting rule
North CarolinaNorth Carolina State Building Code: Building Code2018YesThe rule
MinnesotaInternational Residential Code (IRC)2018 editionYesThe rule
KansasJohnson County Code of Regulations for Buildings and Construction, 2018 Edition2018 Edition, effective July 1, 2020 (2018 International Residential Code, 2018 International Building Code, 2018 International Fire Code, 2018 International Mechanical Code, 2018 International Plumbing Code)YesThe rule
GeorgiaGeorgia State Minimum Standard One and Two Family Dwelling Code (International Residential Code for One- and Two-Family Dwellings with Georgia State Amendments)2018 Edition, revised January 1, 2020YesThe rule
Indiana2020 Indiana Residential Code, 675 IAC 14-4.42020 Indiana Residential Code, incorporating the 2018 International Residential Code for One and Two Family DwellingsYesThe rule
New York2020 Residential Code of New York State (2020 RCNYS), Part 1220 of Title 19 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York2020 RCNYSYesThe rule
UtahInternational Residential Code2021 editionYesThe rule
Connecticut2022 Connecticut State Building Code2021 International Building Code and 2021 International Residential Code, as amendedYesThe rule
AlabamaState Building Code (2021 International Building Code with exceptions)2021, adopted July 1, 2022, amended March 17, 2025YesThe rule
South Carolina2021 South Carolina Building Code / 2021 South Carolina Residential Code2021, implementation date January 1, 2023YesThe rule
New HampshireInternational Building Code2024YesThe rule
MontanaInternational Residential Code2024 EditionYesThe rule
OregonOregon Structural Specialty Code2025YesThe rule
FloridaFlorida Building Code8th Edition (2023)YesThe rule
VermontInternational Building Code, as amended by the 2025 Vermont Fire & Building Safety CodeIBC 2021YesThe rule
Rhode IslandRhode Island Building Code (RISBC-1), 510-RICR-00-00-1International Building Code (IBC), 2021 editionYesThe rule
MichiganMichigan residential code for 1- and 2-family dwellingsinternational residential code, 2015 editionYesThe rule
New JerseyOne- and two-family dwelling subcode, N.J.A.C. 5:23-3.21, adopting the 2024 International Residential Code; building subcode, N.J.A.C. 5:23-3.14, adopting the 2024 International Building CodeIRC/2024 and IBC/2024YesThe rule
MaineMaine Uniform Building and Energy Code (MUBEC)MUBEC, with ASCE 7-16 for snow loadsYesThe rule
WisconsinUniform Dwelling Code, Chs. SPS 320-325 (one- and 2-family dwellings); International Building Code 2021 for commercial work, Chs. SPS 361-366Register November 2024 No. 827 (ch. SPS 321); International Building Code - 2021 (ch. SPS 361)YesThe rule
OhioResidential Code of Ohio (one-, two- and three-family dwellings), Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 4101:8-3; Ohio Building Code, Ohio Administrative Code rule 4101:1-16-01, for all other buildingsResidential Code of Ohio effective July 1, 2019; Ohio Building Code structural rule effective March 1, 2024, adopting the International Building Code, 2021 editionYesThe rule
MassachusettsMassachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR (Tenth Edition), Massachusetts Amendments to the International Building Code 2021Tenth EditionYesThe rule

Ground snow load questions

Advertisement

Fifty states read September 23, 2026: state code offices, building commissions, adopted standards and the county and city building departments that hold the figure where no state does. Every value, adopting rule and case study rule is linked to the document it was printed in. Codes are adopted on a cycle and a county can amend one in between, so the document linked beside a line is what governs on the day. A ground snow load is an input to a structural calculation about one building by somebody who has been to it.