Oregon Ground Snow Load: What the Adopted Code Carries
Oregon takes the national code's figure without a snow amendment of its own.
Oregon takes the national code's figure without a snow amendment of its own
Oregon adopts the national building code without a ground snow load amendment of its own, so the governing figure for a given address is the one the code's own table carries, and the body that applies it is Building Codes Division, State of Oregon. 17 states are in the same position, which makes it the second commonest arrangement in the country.
The code's figure is applied to a given address by Building Codes Division, State of Oregon.
The 2025 OSSC adopts ASCE 7-22, replacing Oregon's legacy SEAO snow load map with a national, risk-targeted, digitally mapped ground snow load database, which fundamentally changes how ground snow loads are determined.BCD Technical Bulletin: Comprehensive Design Snow Load Changes in the 2025 OSSC, read September 23, 2026. Read it at the source
Where a Oregon figure comes from
Oregon publishes ground snow loads through Building Codes Division, State of Oregon, and the jurisdictions reached for this had put none into a public document at the time they were read.
The figure moves with elevation in Oregon, which is the hardest case for a reader: two houses a mile apart and a thousand feet apart take different numbers, and 13 states are keyed this way.
Each figure below appears in the unit and the wording its own document used, and links to the row it was printed in. A pound per square foot is a weight, and how deep a weight of snow sits depends on what that snow has been through since it fell, which is why the documents print the load and leave the depth to the engineer standing at the building.
What Oregon publishes
Oregon does not publish a snow load document of its own, so the record below is the rule that puts the figure where it is rather than a table of figures.
The adopted code
BCD Technical Bulletin: Comprehensive Design Snow Load Changes in the 2025 OSSC
Building Codes Division, State of Oregon, effective Oct. 1, 2025, and mandatory statewide beginning April 1, 2026
Open the document, read September 23, 2026
Case study terrain in Oregon
Part of Oregon is a case study area, meaning the published document expressly declines to give those places a figure and sends the designer back to the local building department for one. 16 states carry a rule like this, and it is the commonest reason a search for a single number comes back empty.
There is no Oregon list to look a town up in: every site has its own value, produced by entering the coordinates into one of two lookup tools, and the answer also depends on the Risk Category assigned to the building.
The 2025 OSSC requires use of the ASCE 7 Hazard Tool (set to ASCE 7-22 version to match the 2025 OSSC) or the Oregon Design Criteria Hub (2025 OSSC application) to determine the site-specific ground snow load based on the assigned Risk Category of the structure.BCD Technical Bulletin: Comprehensive Design Snow Load Changes in the 2025 OSSC, read September 23, 2026. Read it at the source
The office that holds the figure
Building Codes Division, State of Oregon: the division points every site at a coordinate lookup rather than a table.
Whoever publishes the number, the authority having jurisdiction over the parcel is the body that applies it, and it is the body a permit application goes to. Where a county has amended the state or national figure for its own terrain, the county’s figure is the one that governs there.
Building Codes Division, State of Oregon
the division points every site at a coordinate lookup rather than a table
The Oregon Design Criteria Hub is an interactive mapping tool that provides site-specific climatic and geographic design criteria for construction projects governed by the Oregon Residential Specialty Code (ORSC) and the Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC).
The rule that puts it there, read September 23, 2026

What Oregon adopted
Building Codes Division, State of Oregon adopts Oregon Structural Specialty Code (2025). Oregon amended it rather than adopting it whole, and 22 states have done the same.
Editions matter more here than they look as though they should. Codes are adopted on a cycle of a few years, a county can amend one in between, and the national standard changed how it presents ground snow load between recent editions. 22 of the fifty states amended the code they adopted rather than taking it as written, and a state snow load table, where one exists, usually lives in that amendment.
The 2025 OSSC is based on the 2024 International Building Code (IBC) and ASCE 7-22 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures.BCD Technical Bulletin: Comprehensive Design Snow Load Changes in the 2025 OSSC, Building Codes Division, read September 23, 2026. Read it at the source
The same question in the other forty nine
14 states publish a ground snow load of their own, 17 adopt the national code without a snow amendment, and 19 leave every figure to a county or a city. 235 published figures were read across 33 states, and 16 states mark terrain their own document declines to give a figure for.
The table is ordered by how few steps stand between a reader and a figure keyed to their own town, which is a different ranking from how much snow a state gets.
| State | Who publishes the figure | Keyed to | Figures read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | The state drew a map | By region or zone | 14 |
| North Carolina | The state drew a map | By elevation | 3 |
| Wisconsin | The state drew a map | By region or zone | |
| Connecticut | The state publishes a table | County by county | 12 |
| Massachusetts | The state publishes a table | County by county | 12 |
| Michigan | The state publishes a table | County by county | 12 |
| Rhode Island | The state publishes a table | County by county | 12 |
| Utah | The state publishes a table | By elevation | 12 |
| Maryland | The state publishes a table | County by county | 10 |
| Indiana | The state publishes a table | County by county | 9 |
| Minnesota | The state publishes a table | County by county | 8 |
| New Jersey | The state publishes a table | County by county | 6 |
| Montana | A study the state adopted | By elevation | 12 |
| New Hampshire | A study the state adopted | By elevation | 12 |
| Texas | The adopted code | By region or zone | 6 |
| Alaska | The adopted code | By region or zone | 4 |
| New York | The adopted code | By elevation | 4 |
| Maine | The adopted code | County by county | 3 |
| Ohio | The adopted code | County by county | 3 |
| Arkansas | The adopted code | By region or zone | 2 |
| Louisiana | The adopted code | County by county | 1 |
| Alabama | The adopted code | One figure statewide | |
| Florida | The adopted code | One figure statewide | |
| Georgia | The adopted code | County by county | |
| Iowa | The adopted code | Not stated | |
| Kentucky | The adopted code | One figure statewide | |
| Nebraska | The adopted code | Not stated | |
| North Dakota | The adopted code | Not stated | |
| Oregon | The adopted code | By elevation | |
| South Carolina | The adopted code | County by county | |
| Tennessee | The adopted code | County by county | |
| California | Each building department | By elevation | 12 |
| Washington | Each building department | By elevation | 12 |
| Arizona | Each building department | By elevation | 11 |
| Nevada | Each building department | By elevation | 9 |
| Delaware | Each building department | County by county | 7 |
| Idaho | Each building department | By elevation | 6 |
| Oklahoma | Each building department | By region or zone | 6 |
| Virginia | Each building department | County by county | 4 |
| Wyoming | Each building department | By region or zone | 4 |
| Pennsylvania | Each building department | County by county | 3 |
| Colorado | Each building department | By elevation | 2 |
| Kansas | Each building department | County by county | 1 |
| South Dakota | Each building department | County by county | 1 |
| Hawaii | Each building department | Not stated | |
| Illinois | Each building department | Not stated | |
| Mississippi | Each building department | County by county | |
| Missouri | Each building department | Not stated | |
| New Mexico | Each building department | By elevation | |
| West Virginia | Each building department | County by county |
Oregon ground snow load questions
Ground snow load in every state
Oregon read September 23, 2026: Building Codes Division, State of Oregon, BCD Technical Bulletin: Comprehensive Design Snow Load Changes in the 2025 OSSC, and the county and city building departments that publish a figure where the state does not. Every value, adopting rule and case study rule above links to the document it was printed in. Codes are adopted on a cycle and a jurisdiction can amend one in between, so the document linked beside a line is what governs on the day. A ground snow load is an input to a structural calculation about one building by somebody who has been to it.