Blue-Green Algae in Arizona Lakes

Blue-green algae advisories in Arizona are issued and lifted by Arizona Department of Environmental Quality with the Department of Health Services, and a bloom can move across a lake on the wind inside an afternoon, so the current answer is theirs: Arizona Harmful Algal Blooms carries the department’s reported bloom listing, its identification guidance and the Arizona Water Watch reporting app. EPA draws the same line: "State, Tribal and local governments may issue advisories for water bodies with HABs." This page gives you who owns the question here, what it takes to get a waterbody posted, and the link to today's status.

At Arizona Harmful Algal Blooms, which carries the department’s reported bloom listing, its identification guidance and the Arizona Water Watch reporting app. EPA’s federal directory gives azdeq.gov/node/3464, an internal node address that now redirects. The address above is where it lands and it answered on 2026-09-03. The sign at the access point outranks any website, including that one, because somebody put it there after looking at that specific water. CDC's own advice is to "Check for and follow swimming, fishing, and shellfish advisories" and to "Stay out of discolored, scummy, or smelly water and keep pets away"

No, and this is the most important sentence on this page. Arkansas DEQ puts it plainly: "A water body with no HAB advisory is not an indication that a bloom is not present. Blooms are unpredictable. They can develop rapidly and may move across a water body due to wind or water current. If you suspect that a water body is experiencing a harmful algal bloom, it is best to avoid." An absent advisory can mean the lake was sampled and the result was under the state threshold, or that nobody has sampled that lake this year, or that the sample predates the calm hot week that just built the bloom. Arizona publishes verified reports rather than a survey, so a lake missing from the map is a lake nobody has reported.

Nothing, as far as EPA can tell. EPA's compilation of state and Tribal toxin thresholds, updated July 13, 2026, records no recreational cyanotoxin threshold for Arizona. That does not mean Arizona ignores blooms; Arizona Department of Environmental Quality with the Department of Health Services runs a programme and it appears on this page. It means the decision to post rests on visual assessment, cell counts or professional judgement rather than on a published concentration, so there is no number to compare against another state's.

CDC: "Harmful algal blooms can look like foam, scum, mats, or paint on the surface of the water. They can also grow underneath the water, making some harmful algal blooms hard to see." EPA adds the detail that catches people out, which is that the danger outlasts the visible bloom: "Microcystis is the most common bloom-forming genus. Its blooms resemble a greenish, thick, paint-like (sometimes granular) material that accumulates along shores. Scums that dry on the shores of lakes may contain high concentrations of microcystin for several months, allowing toxins to dissolve in the water even when the cells are no longer alive or after a recently collapsed bloom." Arizona Department of Environmental Quality puts the local version this way: "Boating and fishing are acceptable during blue-green algal blooms, but people should follow the advice above and avoid contact with or ingestion of the water."

Yes, and every state programme in the country says so. CDC: "Contact a veterinarian immediately if your pets or livestock seem sick after going in or near water. Animals can get very sick or even die within hours of coming into contact with harmful algae or cyanobacteria." A dog wades the shallow downwind edge where the scum concentrates, drinks the water, then licks its coat, which is three exposure routes a swimmer does not have. Two states, Indiana and Oregon, publish separate and far lower cyanotoxin values for dogs; most do not, which is a gap rather than an all clear. If an animal is sick after being in or near water, CDC says to contact a veterinarian immediately.

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality with the Department of Health Services, through the reporting route on Arizona Harmful Algal Blooms. In most states a bloom becomes known because somebody reported it rather than because a sampling schedule found it, which is why the reporting form is usually the most prominent thing on a state HAB page. For a person with symptoms, CDC says: "If you think you have symptoms caused by a harmful algal bloom, contact a healthcare provider or the Poison Control hotline at 1-800-222-1222." For an animal, a veterinarian, straight away. Reports reach the agency through that route, not through this page.

No, three separate things with three separate lab tests. EPA: "Several different types of algae can produce toxic HABs. The most common algae associated with marine toxic HABs include the dinoflagellates (e.g., Florida red tide Karenia brevis) and diatoms (Pseudo-nitzschia) while those most associated with freshwaters are dominated by cyanobacteria (e.g., Microcystis)." Red tide is marine, caused by Karenia brevis and monitored by different agencies, and our red tide pages cover it. A beach advisory at a coastal or Great Lakes beach is usually about fecal indicator bacteria under the BEACH Act, which our beach water pages cover. A bacteria result says nothing about cyanotoxins and a cyanotoxin result says nothing about bacteria.

From EPA's compilation of state and Tribal cyanotoxin thresholds, which EPA describes as "This page offers a compilation of the cyanotoxins thresholds used by state and Tribal programs to make advisory decisions for drinking water and recreational uses." We read its 146 rows on 2026-09-03, as the page stood after its July 13, 2026 update, and stored them unchanged; a US Government work in the public domain. EPA's federal directory link for Arizona no longer resolves cleanly, and the note above the link on this page says where it lands now. Every figure on this page is EPA's.