Utah Snowpack: Water in the Snow, Station by Station
Utah has more snow telemetry stations than any other state, and the largest share of them too new to carry a thirty year normal. It is also where the biggest gap between total stations and usable stations shows up in the numbers.
Where Utah snowpack stands
Utah snow stations on the map
The Utah stations, lowest first
A station is one clearing. It reads the snow lying on its own pillow, and that can differ sharply from a slope a mile away and a thousand feet higher. Reading one station against its own past is far more informative than reading two stations against each other, which is why the last column gives each one its own percentile rather than a rank against its neighbours.

Which Utah basins are carrying the water
Utah drains two ways at once. The eastern half runs to the Colorado and leaves the state; the western half runs into the Great Basin and never reaches an ocean at all, ending in the Great Salt Lake or in the desert. A single statewide percentage averages across that divide, which is why the basin breakdown on this page is worth more than the state number above it.
The basin names below are the six digit hydrologic units the station records carry, named from the United States Geological Survey boundary dataset. Utah covers 13 of them across 29 counties. A basin appears once three or more of its stations are reporting.
This day, across the Utah record
A single percentage tells you where today sits against a thirty year median. It does not tell you whether that is unusual, and the two questions have genuinely different answers: a state can be at 70 percent of median in a year that is nowhere near its worst.
What the agency forecast for Utah in 2026
This is the completed record of a finished season. The Natural Resources Conservation Service issues seasonal runoff volume forecasts for 82 points in Utah, monthly through the winter and spring, and each issue supersedes the last. Below are the biggest of those points and how each forecast moved as the snow year revealed itself.
The current runoff forecast is published by the agency; the most recent issue shown here is months old by definition, because the series closes in early summer. For the forecast that applies now, go to the agency, or to NOAA Colorado Basin River Forecast Center for river stage.
Colorado R nr Cisco
April 1 to July 31 runoff volume, thousands of acre feet. Normal for that period 3750. 4 issues on file for water year 2026.
The bar is the range the agency published at each issue, from the ninety percent exceedence value at the bottom to the ten percent value at the top, with the fifty percent value marked. An exceedence probability is the chance the actual volume exceeds that number, so ninety is the low end and ten is the high end. The fifty percent figure moved from 2480 on the January 1 issue to 1200 on the April 1 issue, or 66 percent of normal down to 32 percent. Those are the agency’s numbers for a season that has finished; the current forecast is on the agency’s own site.
Green R at Green River, UT
April 1 to July 31 runoff volume, thousands of acre feet. Normal for that period 2610. 4 issues on file for water year 2026.
The bar is the range the agency published at each issue, from the ninety percent exceedence value at the bottom to the ten percent value at the top, with the fifty percent value marked. An exceedence probability is the chance the actual volume exceeds that number, so ninety is the low end and ten is the high end. The fifty percent figure moved from 1930 on the January 1 issue to 1150 on the April 1 issue, or 74 percent of normal down to 44 percent. Those are the agency’s numbers for a season that has finished; the current forecast is on the agency’s own site.
Flaming Gorge Reservoir Inflow
April 1 to July 31 runoff volume, thousands of acre feet. Normal for that period 990. 4 issues on file for water year 2026.
The bar is the range the agency published at each issue, from the ninety percent exceedence value at the bottom to the ten percent value at the top, with the fifty percent value marked. An exceedence probability is the chance the actual volume exceeds that number, so ninety is the low end and ten is the high end. The fifty percent figure moved from 960 on the January 1 issue to 535 on the April 1 issue, or 97 percent of normal down to 54 percent. Those are the agency’s numbers for a season that has finished; the current forecast is on the agency’s own site.
San Juan R near Bluff
April 1 to July 31 runoff volume, thousands of acre feet. Normal for that period 895. 4 issues on file for water year 2026.
The bar is the range the agency published at each issue, from the ninety percent exceedence value at the bottom to the ten percent value at the top, with the fifty percent value marked. An exceedence probability is the chance the actual volume exceeds that number, so ninety is the low end and ten is the high end. The fifty percent figure moved from 735 on the January 1 issue to 275 on the April 1 issue, or 82 percent of normal down to 31 percent. Those are the agency’s numbers for a season that has finished; the current forecast is on the agency’s own site.
Great Salt Lake Inflow
April 1 to July 31 runoff volume, thousands of acre feet. Normal for that period 450. 4 issues on file for water year 2026.
The bar is the range the agency published at each issue, from the ninety percent exceedence value at the bottom to the ten percent value at the top, with the fifty percent value marked. An exceedence probability is the chance the actual volume exceeds that number, so ninety is the low end and ten is the high end. The fifty percent figure moved from 410 on the January 1 issue to 240 on the April 1 issue, or 91 percent of normal down to 53 percent. Those are the agency’s numbers for a season that has finished; the current forecast is on the agency’s own site.
Duchesne R nr Randlett
April 1 to July 31 runoff volume, thousands of acre feet. Normal for that period 255. 4 issues on file for water year 2026.
The bar is the range the agency published at each issue, from the ninety percent exceedence value at the bottom to the ten percent value at the top, with the fifty percent value marked. An exceedence probability is the chance the actual volume exceeds that number, so ninety is the low end and ten is the high end. The fifty percent figure moved from 240 on the January 1 issue to 91 on the April 1 issue, or 94 percent of normal down to 36 percent. Those are the agency’s numbers for a season that has finished; the current forecast is on the agency’s own site.
Volumes are in thousands of acre feet, in the units the agency publishes. Each point’s forecast period is printed above its chart, because the period is not the same everywhere: the Southwest runs off earlier and its forecasts are issued for an earlier window. Volumes from different periods are not comparable.
What the Utah snowpack number shows
The peak date on this page is a median of medians. Across the 104 Utah stations that publish one, the individual median peak dates span 72 days, from February 22 to May 5. A low station on a south face and a high one in a north facing cirque are in different climates, and averaging them produces a date that describes neither.
37 of the 141 Utah stations have no 1991 to 2020 median at all, nearly always because they were installed too recently to have thirty years behind them. A station with no normal cannot be a percentage of one, so it appears on the map and in the table with its measurement and no percentage, and it is left out of the state total. The panel at the top of this page prints both counts.
Utah has the widest gap in the country between stations installed and stations old enough to have a 1991 to 2020 normal. The state figure is computed only on the ones that do, and the panel says how many that leaves.
How Utah sits against the rest of the network. Its middle station is at 8,720 ft, against 10,275 ft in Colorado and 1,345 ft in Alaska. Elevation is not a proxy for depth: the deepest packs in the country sit on some of the lowest stations, because a maritime climate delivers far more water per storm than a continental one.

Utah snowpack FAQ

Snow, melt and what happens after
Avalanche forecasts for the layers inside this same snowpack are issued by named forecasters at the avalanche centres: avalanche forecasts by state.
Sources for this page
- USDA NRCS Air and Water Database, daily snow water equivalent filesfederal, public domain Read 2026-09-04.
One file per calendar day carrying every station’s entire period of record for that day. Measured at 102,474 bytes and 0.17 seconds for September 3 and 192,640 bytes for March 15, keyless and open to any origin. This is the source of every reading on these pages.
- USDA NRCS Air and Water Database REST APIfederal, public domain Read 2026-09-04.
The documented API behind the same database. Used to build the station inventory, to verify that the daily files decode correctly, and as the fallback when the daily files cannot be reached.
- USDA NRCS report generatorfederal, public domain Read 2026-09-04.
The one source that emits NRCS’s own labelled percent of median. Used to prove our figures reproduce the agency’s: all 118 Colorado stations matched exactly on value, median and percentage for March 15, 2026. Too slow to read live, at 8.9 seconds for one state.
- USDA NRCS interactive station mapfederal, public domain Read 2026-09-04.
The agency’s own live map of every station it operates. This is where a reader goes for the official current picture, and every page in this vertical links it.
- USGS Watershed Boundary Datasetfederal, public domain Read 2026-09-04.
NRCS station records carry a bare twelve digit hydrologic unit code and no name. The basin names on these pages come from the USGS boundary dataset, which named all 96 six digit basins in the station inventory.
- California Department of Water Resources, California Data Exchange Centerstate agency, linked not reproduced Read 2026-09-04.
California’s own snow survey and the authority for California snowpack. Its data cannot be read from a browser on this site because it sends no cross origin header on any endpoint tested, including the preflight. It is linked rather than reproduced, and the California page explains where the two networks disagree.
Snow water equivalent measurements on this page are federal records collected by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and are in the public domain. Percentages use the 1991 to 2020 normals period. The Utah and basin totals are our arithmetic on those measurements and are not agency published indices. Water supply forecasts and runoff projections come from the agencies named above. Every state with a snowpack page →
Hero image: “Skiing at Snowbird Utah” by Don Ramey Logan, CC BY 4.0